[microsound] meta-theory

[Manannan Mac Lir]

What do you base this dualism on, it appears Taoist possibly (except for
self similarity). Does it come from observation? I think from an
analytical perspective it also places itself in an area inaccessible to
certain forms of criticism that cant take into account emergent
behaviour.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Adam Davis"
  To: microsound at microsound.org
  Subject: Re: [microsound] meta-theory
  Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:15:16 +0100

  Mannanan, Thank you for starting such a thread. Well, I like to
  contemplate a fusion of nihilism with self-similarity; everything is
  a metaphor for everything and everything else. Everything is
  everything and everything else. All is infinitely self-similar. Thus,
  everything is neither superior nor inferior to everything else;
  everything is neither more beautiful nor more ugly than everything
  else. I find such a concept very harmonious, and yet by the nature of
  everything, or rather infinity, it self-references, covering the very
  opposites to all that I have stated, and how I find such a concept
  very disharmonious also. This is my personal indulgence in a new kind
  of music...the aforementioned harmony and the loops and cycles of the
  self-reference subsequently (like the loops and cycles of rhythms)
  and the rhythm of opposites, reactions and the harmony of symmetry
  created from such conceptual equal and opposite reactions .  Adam
  James Davis

     



  _______________________________________________
  microsound mailing list
  microsound at microsound.org
  http://or8.net/mailman/listinfo/microsound

-- 
An Excellent Credit Score is 750 
See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://or8.net/pipermail/microsound/attachments/20090926/8e51c5ca/attachment.html>