The distance from ideology to sound seems like a rather long leap to my eyes at times (with the piece featuring sounds from Iraq being a notable exception, one which I wasn't brave enough to listen to...)<br><br>I guess I'm personally interested more in the sounds than the ideas. Perhaps that is my deficit. I have been enjoying the recent Marxist banter, but fear I won't find the time to follow up on any of it anytime soon (whereas I'll be more likely to act on suggestions of new ways of forming sounds much sooner). <br>
<br>What I am expressing is probably my loss, but it is truth.<br><br>-Jason<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:52 AM, John Hopkins <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jhopkins@tech-no-mad.net">jhopkins@tech-no-mad.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
On the other hand, I think the most important thing to be doing here on microsound is the (parroting) expression of phat ideologies, but more the idiosyncratic expressions of what individuals on the list are perceiving ... that's my 2-cents, whilst waiting for Regime Change...<font color="#888888"><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>