d4l3d at inbox.com
Fri Jun 5 02:18:16 EDT 2009
...and just as obviously, I replied before I thought. I tend to occasional episodes of profound naivete.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vze26m98 at optonline.net
> Sent: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:53:24 -0400
> To: microsound at microsound.org
> Subject: Re: [microsound] test
> On Jun 4, 2009, at 3:58 PM, d4l3d wrote:
>> In case no one else has replied yet, obviously yes. This one, anyway.
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: tobiasreber at sunrise.ch
>>> Sent: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:49:20 +0200
>>> To: microsound at microsound.org
>>> Subject: Re: [microsound] test
>>> dear list,
>>> do you get my messages?
>>> one reply only please, just so i know.
> Well, d4l3d-
> You're very kind to reply, but I would have thought that Mr. Reber
> would have received his own message without the need for a 3rd party
> confirmation if properly subscribed.
> They may not be rip off artists, but it looks like you'll get killed
> with stupidity instead.
> microsound mailing list
> microsound at microsound.org
More information about the microsound